Lens/Software For Refocusing After the Fact: Will it fly, or is true 3D around the corner?

At first glance, this looks pretty awesome. Take a picture. Look at the result. Adjust the focus to a different part of the photo. But there's a catch of course. It's using a modified lens which allows the camera to record some degree of 3D information. So we're talking advanced camera processors (to handle the computations), new data formats for photos, and of course, new cameras. A business model that depends on moving new hardware into consumer cameras is a tough sell.

There seem to be a growing number of attempts to move photos into the 3D world (Make3D, Photosynth, Photo Pop-Up) . 3D manipulation is finally affordable to consumers (SpaceNavigator), and low-end game-tech is being repurposed to provide cheap head tracking capabilities (WiiRemote). With all these tools on the verge of being commercially available, and a wide number of popular 3D environments in which they could be used (ranging from games to virtual worlds), I wonder whether technologies like this refocus tool aren't going to be tossed aside for the real thing—true 3D imaging.

That said, their approach (and their patents) may well play a role. A modified lens that captures multiple images on the CCD is likely to be a much cheaper solution than using multiple lenses (although the binary separation might need to be software-enhanced). Camera resolutions are getting to the point where consumers don't see the point, but this would drive demand for higher resolutions, making the hardware folks happy. Embed the extra info in a standard JPEG and adoption would be even more likely. Old software sees 2D, new software sees 3D.

Start-up lets you fix focus after snapping the shutter Underexposed - CNET News.com


A lot more image processing is required, for one thing, though Ng legitimately points out that camera processors are steadily improving. Another big drawback is that the full resolution of the image sensor isn't available in the ultimate image the camera produces.

Ng isn't willing to discuss exactly how much resolution is lost in the process at this stage in the company's research. "You can get gorgeous 4x6 prints or (larger), and take those much more dependably," he said.


Refocus Imaging
Categories:

Leave a comment

(not displayed)

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.marrowbones.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/95

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Lens/Software For Refocusing After the Fact: Will it fly, or is true 3D around the corner?.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Kee Hinckley published on February 27, 2008 1:33 PM.

Who do you call when a cargo ship capsizes? was the previous entry in this blog.

Lauren Weinstein: "Tags instead of Takedowns" -- Does anyone remember PICS? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Subscribe via Reader

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About Me

I'm the CEO/CTO of Somewhere, Inc., a company building a unified social networking layer that gives people the means to track their friends across multiple social networks.
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.